Manifestation's dissection into transcendental and immanent realms follows the form of the distinction of meta-physical from mundane limited finite matters. It cannot be maintained and slips away and is thus ultimately groundless.
What is transcendent is identified with Pure Presence Being (present-at-hand) by Heidegger. This is because it imposes the criteria of pure availability on what is manifest which is the transcendent principle of freedom.
What is immanent is identified with Process Being (ready-to-hand) by Heidegger.
Because it cannot be maintained two cases arise:
Transcendence in the Immanent which may be identified with Hyper Being.
This is when there is some unmanifest transcendental within the immanent.
Immanent in the Transcendent which may be identified with Wild Being.
This is when the transcendent bursts into the immanent realm.
Another way to derive the kinds of Being systematically is to look at the four propositions if Indian Logic:
This is the assertion of anything what so ever. Such an assertion is a positing of something and thus a manifestation. It is related to Pure Presence Being.
This assertion is the opposite of A. Having an opposite suggests the ability to turn something into its opposite and thus a process. This is related to Process Being. Such a process can go in two directions. The reverse of the process is called by Sartre Nothingness.
This assertion negates both the proposition and its opposite.It is related to Hyper Being because that kind of Being is the cancellation of Process Being and Nothingness its opposite. It is both the process of unfolding and the process of folding up cancel. This is related to the epoche of the Skeptic and the putting aside of the antinomies of the Buddha.
This is the active contradiction of A and its opposite. It can be seen also as the Chiasm of Wild Being. This is related to Dialectics and the indication of the non-dual basis of existence.
When Heidegger discovered the difference between Pure Presence and Process Being based on Husserl's work he established what has been called an Ontological Monism. That is to say that Being was seen as one kind of thing with two modes or faces. However, when Hyper Being was discovered it became clear that the differences between the kinds of Being were too many and too radical to be just modes. Thus it became clear that there were at least four kinds of Being.
is opposite
which in turn are opposite both
is opposite
We speak of the Kindness Of Being because together the four kinds of Being provide the structural basis within the groundlessness of our world. Our world is our home in which we dwell. Thus the different kinds of Being working together give us our dwelling place in the world. The main way that they do that is by providing us with the ability to abstract and idealize phenomena. They form the basis of our noesis that arises out of the noema. Both noesis and noema make up the totality of what our intentionality posits. Intentionality operates in the present-at-hand. But it breaks down into noesis and noema which form a spectrum that we move back and forth along in the process of receiving manifestation (or projecting it as the case may be). Within the noetic and nomeatic contents of consciousness that we apprehend there are non-manifest aspects that continually act on our consciousness in myriad ways. Ultimately we find out that the totality of the manifest IS the unmanifest. In other words we see the unmanifest in its traces as it acts on the whole of consciousness. This mixing of the manifest and the unmanifest is Wild Being where as the recognition of the unmanifest as transcendence within immanence is Hyper Being. Hyper Being 'appears' when we bring opposite processes within consciousness against each other so they cancel out. The cancellation of opposite processes is Hyper Being. It is the Clearing of Being rather than the Cleaning in Being that we see as processes that give us the transparency of the world.